please feel free to introduce yourselves to each other in comments!

[kaberett]

9. Are there two people on your reading list that you think should meet?

I am grumpily unconvinced by this one - I think public introductions are incredibly high-pressure and generally a rubbish thing to do to people - and even a list of people I think are awesome and worth subscribing to inevitably means I will miss people off. SO INSTEAD let us have a tiny subscription meme: introduce yourself in one alliterative sentence (if you feel like playing a game, and don't bother with the alliteration if you don't) and then feel free to expand (minus the alliteration) in conversation. I like it when you lot talk!

---

I am teeth-grinding and nightmaring and insomnia-ing. Slightly to my surprise, this appears to be the form my pre-period mood crash is taking this month; "surprise" because I'm not used to it being this mild. On the downside, this means that back-of-enveloping it, I'm... kind of due to be in pain and misery during Finals, but hey, what can you do, if I'm lucky stress and the vagaries of a slightly irregular cycle will see me through, and if not I shall just take LOTS OF DRUGS.

Comments

[pipisafoat]

(pretty sure my answer to that question would have been "yes! now everybody should talk to try to figure out who it is they might want to meet.")

precocious pip plays poker poorly! (it is the only alliterative sentence I can come up with on my way out the door to an exam so PLEASE EXCUSE. while true (though I reckon I can't quite claim precocious anymore), the sentence is unrepresentative of me.)

[kaberett]

I really love this sentence, and it is such a good summary of my perception of your general attitude, in all the best ways ♥

[pipisafoat]

You perceive me as being cheerfully horrid at poker? O_o

[kaberett]

ON A META LEVEL.

[pipisafoat]

*shrug* it's all accurate! Merely unexpected.

[kaberett]

By which I mean wryly self-analytical and occasionally poking fun at it. IN PART. That is not all of you.