![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(Not sure what's going on here? The answer is Ancillary Justice.)
We're told that Radchaai does not bother with gendered pronouns. It seems to me that the default pronoun used means gender-irrelevant (rather than gender-unknown or gender-specific, which seem to me to be a useful way of considering pronouns of gendered beings). We're told that Strigan's society uses gender-known pronouns even though it professes to consider gender irrelevant.
And yet: the Radchaai frequently refer to ships as "it" (I note that the standard English pronoun used to refer to vessels is the same as the way in which the Radchaai default pronoun is rendered). It's clearly not as simple as in/animate - ships have emotions, ships have personality and identity, ships are sentient, ships have ancillaries. Except that this is done in a literally dehumanising way - ships are explicitly not Radchaai, not citizens, and therefore not considered human; characters who are uninterested in or unsympathetic toward ships are far more likely to refer to them as "it", whereas characters who like ships seem to mostly not pronoun them; non-Radchaai humans are generally called the standard pronoun for Radchaai, despite being considered by at least some in the society to have sub-human status - and so I am left picking away at what distinction it is the Radch is making here...
Thoughts very much appreciated!
We're told that Radchaai does not bother with gendered pronouns. It seems to me that the default pronoun used means gender-irrelevant (rather than gender-unknown or gender-specific, which seem to me to be a useful way of considering pronouns of gendered beings). We're told that Strigan's society uses gender-known pronouns even though it professes to consider gender irrelevant.
And yet: the Radchaai frequently refer to ships as "it" (I note that the standard English pronoun used to refer to vessels is the same as the way in which the Radchaai default pronoun is rendered). It's clearly not as simple as in/animate - ships have emotions, ships have personality and identity, ships are sentient, ships have ancillaries. Except that this is done in a literally dehumanising way - ships are explicitly not Radchaai, not citizens, and therefore not considered human; characters who are uninterested in or unsympathetic toward ships are far more likely to refer to them as "it", whereas characters who like ships seem to mostly not pronoun them; non-Radchaai humans are generally called the standard pronoun for Radchaai, despite being considered by at least some in the society to have sub-human status - and so I am left picking away at what distinction it is the Radch is making here...
Thoughts very much appreciated!
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 08:36 am (UTC)The Presger as a species (and other alien species) are given barely any thought, and I think have not (yet!) been discussed as individuals rather than aggregate, so have not been pronouned. Non-human species are the most obvious category for "barbarians", but are mostly treated with wary respect at least by PoV characters. Ships are perhaps viewed as slaves, but using a different pronoun class for that seems like an interesting choice (and is not consistent with what Latin texts I've read); and especially is strange because we know that ships can have authority and the Radch is ruled by an AI, Anaander Mianaai. Interestingly, non-Radch people typically gender Anaander Mianaai, and AM gets standard Radchaai pronouns (instead of "it") despite being an AI. The exception that proves the rule...?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 09:44 am (UTC)Good observation about the pronouns not applying to ships, I'd not thought about that at all. In a lot of sci-fi, there's an additional reason people may use "it" for AIs, if they're nongendered, but that doesn't apply in the Radch. I guess, they don't treat ships as people, but they do treat AM as a person.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:04 am (UTC)Because humans are treated as mortal and AM clearly isn't (3000 years old! - and we know Justice of Toren is 2000 years old), and if the tech existed to turn humans into the kind of AI that Justice of Toren clearly is (or if it wasn't wildly taboo) I'd assumed AI originated as one of the earliest AIs; I'd expect that to at least be discussed - humans have access to the necessary tech to transfer AI consciousness into ancillaries, so one would've thought that if human-->human transference were possible there would at least be a great deal of suppression of it, particularly among the hideously rich.
(And I am now thinking of Jessie Hajicek's The God Eaters, which involves gods consuming other gods to gain power & domain...)
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:44 am (UTC)Oh, God Eaters sounds fascinating, I want to read that.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:47 am (UTC)ETA here's The God Eaters and some of the overview incl a link to his webcomic, Metanoia, which I loved; pretty much of everything is up at
Also, sparked by the "was originally human" thing, STRONGLY recommend Benjanun Sriduangkaew's Hegemony verse (if you haven't already read, and even if you have! She was a John W Campbell nominee this year and is eligible again next year, and I really want her to get it...)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 01:07 pm (UTC)Which is playing games with gender perception right there!
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-18 09:07 pm (UTC)AM 3000 years old
Breq 2000 years old
Seivarden 1000 years old
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 05:43 pm (UTC)(1) okay, we already had autonomous AIs with emotions when Anaander Mianaai "took" power
(2) interesting contrast of the pronouns there!
(3) the mirroring of the language with JoT-One Esk Nineteen talking about how they were made, and how AM was made
(4) very interesting about what this tells us about how AM came to power - bearing in mind that JoT is only 2000 years old
(5) ... yeah I'm still pretty convinced that AM is an AI who seized core Radch space out of some sort of drive to protect some specific humans (a particularly favoured captain and her family?), and then took great care (as post-Garsedd) that anyone who knew the truth ended up dead, which would explain the lack of rumours...
ETA ooooooooooh in which case the genetic template for her bodies could be said Particularly Favoured Captain...! HEADCANON IS GO
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 06:22 pm (UTC)Oh, oh, oh. That does make so much sense...
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 11:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 11:30 am (UTC)Notes:
- One Esk were not permitted to serve in the temple in Ors, but Anaander Mianaai does serve in temples
- ships are non-citizen but Anaander Mianaai is here explicitly citizen
... I'm still torn on whether this means that AM gets exceptionalism applied...
(no subject)
Date: 2014-11-26 07:34 pm (UTC)"You are if I say you are, she said.
Late reply because I've been rereading this whole post/comments and have thoughts. And because I ran across that quotation and it backed up what you were saying about exceptionalism and under what conditions ships get to be citizens.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH (spoilers for first chapter of Ancillary Sword)
Date: 2014-09-18 01:49 pm (UTC)^ AM!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 11:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 10:52 am (UTC)But then of course there's the complexity that AM clearly has emotions, but didn't originally design ship AIs to have emotions, and stuck those in later...
I don't recall the thing about governorship, but am currently ~1/3rd of the way through a reread and will keep an eye out. (I GET MORE OUT OF IT EVERY TIME, FOR SRS.)
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 12:28 pm (UTC)I wasn't sure if JoT's increasing self-determination as Breq was solely due to increasingly escaping programmed safeguards AM put in the main brain, or if there was a suggestion that organic brains were inherently more people-y, and Breq was more like "JoT Esk One brain, with JoT memories". I don't like that interpretation as much, because it's less interesting distributed-consciousness-wise, but it's somewhat straightforward and common in other SF.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 12:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 01:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 12:11 am (UTC)