![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(Not sure what's going on here? The answer is Ancillary Justice.)
We're told that Radchaai does not bother with gendered pronouns. It seems to me that the default pronoun used means gender-irrelevant (rather than gender-unknown or gender-specific, which seem to me to be a useful way of considering pronouns of gendered beings). We're told that Strigan's society uses gender-known pronouns even though it professes to consider gender irrelevant.
And yet: the Radchaai frequently refer to ships as "it" (I note that the standard English pronoun used to refer to vessels is the same as the way in which the Radchaai default pronoun is rendered). It's clearly not as simple as in/animate - ships have emotions, ships have personality and identity, ships are sentient, ships have ancillaries. Except that this is done in a literally dehumanising way - ships are explicitly not Radchaai, not citizens, and therefore not considered human; characters who are uninterested in or unsympathetic toward ships are far more likely to refer to them as "it", whereas characters who like ships seem to mostly not pronoun them; non-Radchaai humans are generally called the standard pronoun for Radchaai, despite being considered by at least some in the society to have sub-human status - and so I am left picking away at what distinction it is the Radch is making here...
Thoughts very much appreciated!
We're told that Radchaai does not bother with gendered pronouns. It seems to me that the default pronoun used means gender-irrelevant (rather than gender-unknown or gender-specific, which seem to me to be a useful way of considering pronouns of gendered beings). We're told that Strigan's society uses gender-known pronouns even though it professes to consider gender irrelevant.
And yet: the Radchaai frequently refer to ships as "it" (I note that the standard English pronoun used to refer to vessels is the same as the way in which the Radchaai default pronoun is rendered). It's clearly not as simple as in/animate - ships have emotions, ships have personality and identity, ships are sentient, ships have ancillaries. Except that this is done in a literally dehumanising way - ships are explicitly not Radchaai, not citizens, and therefore not considered human; characters who are uninterested in or unsympathetic toward ships are far more likely to refer to them as "it", whereas characters who like ships seem to mostly not pronoun them; non-Radchaai humans are generally called the standard pronoun for Radchaai, despite being considered by at least some in the society to have sub-human status - and so I am left picking away at what distinction it is the Radch is making here...
Thoughts very much appreciated!
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 12:28 pm (UTC)I wasn't sure if JoT's increasing self-determination as Breq was solely due to increasingly escaping programmed safeguards AM put in the main brain, or if there was a suggestion that organic brains were inherently more people-y, and Breq was more like "JoT Esk One brain, with JoT memories". I don't like that interpretation as much, because it's less interesting distributed-consciousness-wise, but it's somewhat straightforward and common in other SF.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 12:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 05:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-16 07:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 12:15 am (UTC)(I note with interest that I defaulted to "they" there; I also note with interest that JoT refers to their segments as "it" but doesn't as far as I can tell ever use a third-person pronoun for itself.)
(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 01:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2014-09-17 01:38 pm (UTC)WRT station AI look at the scene after the outbreak of hostilities where they're headed dockside and, IIRC, Station tells Breq it doesn't like her and wants her gone.