![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Creepy reviews that simultaneously Other and fetishise me mean I've arrived, right?
Never mind the misgendering (I state at the beginning of the show that even when I was young, I was "pretty sure I wasn't going to be either a man or a lady [when I grew up]" at the beginning of the show, and that I am - at a subsequent point in the show - correctly gendered: I think I'm actually most grossed out by the fact that he's referring to a group of people of whom at 22 I am by a significant margin the youngest as "girls"...
But, hey, the audiences are liking what we're doing, and I'm by and large having a great time, so.
Never mind the misgendering (I state at the beginning of the show that even when I was young, I was "pretty sure I wasn't going to be either a man or a lady [when I grew up]" at the beginning of the show, and that I am - at a subsequent point in the show - correctly gendered: I think I'm actually most grossed out by the fact that he's referring to a group of people of whom at 22 I am by a significant margin the youngest as "girls"...
But, hey, the audiences are liking what we're doing, and I'm by and large having a great time, so.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-08 08:39 pm (UTC)*Actually* disabled? What does that mean then?!
The 'girls' issue seems pervasive - the Olympics have been plagued by it!
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-09 12:06 am (UTC)It's still totally disgust-o-gross, but I see why it's so pervasive. (Which is why I avoid using the word completely, unless described party has specifically and exactly specified they are comfortable with and would like to be called that. I like to think it balances things out an infinitesimal amount.)
(e: Also, don't mean to imply that codified English is any more legitimate than what isn't in a dictionary. This is a pretty evident case where it is, in fact, less legitimate.)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-08 11:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-09 08:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-15 08:35 am (UTC)1. That review reads to me as "I want to give a positive review, but doing that would make me less of a manly man, so I must preface and suffix it with excuses"
2. meh, reviews. If your seats are staying full, that's what counts[1]. The opinions of the many, spreading by word of mouth, over that of one guy.
EDIT: Also, love the photo :-)
[1] At least in terms of what other people think. That's perhaps not the only thing to measure art by, although theatre tends to lean that way more than, say, painting.