In re CA:CW, tangentially
May. 9th, 2016 11:52 amStrong Female Protagonist, which I've recced before and will rec again, is a webcomic that has consistently thought hard about definition, regulation and registration of super-powered humans, and about morality and ethics and how to make good choices. It doesn't have answers; it does have compassion. I like it a lot.
(... this is not exactly a CA:CW hate blog, but I do think it's sort of tragic that a freak meteorite destroyed the Marvel studios after GotG was released, so they never got a chance to fulfill the potential of the storylines they'd set up up to that point. But hey, your blue-eyed boys is canon.)
eta I take it back, this is a Civil War hate blog, I had not at that point seen this (trigger warning, I seriously cannot work out how to words things beyond that in ways that aren't ~~a spoiler~~, but please do note that I distinguish between "content note" for "bad things happen" and "trigger warning" for "this is handled abhorrently")
(... this is not exactly a CA:CW hate blog, but I do think it's sort of tragic that a freak meteorite destroyed the Marvel studios after GotG was released, so they never got a chance to fulfill the potential of the storylines they'd set up up to that point. But hey, your blue-eyed boys is canon.)
eta I take it back, this is a Civil War hate blog, I had not at that point seen this (trigger warning, I seriously cannot work out how to words things beyond that in ways that aren't ~~a spoiler~~, but please do note that I distinguish between "content note" for "bad things happen" and "trigger warning" for "this is handled abhorrently")
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 12:36 pm (UTC)Wait... what?
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-10 04:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 03:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 03:37 pm (UTC)\o/
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 04:07 pm (UTC)(I have now gone oh-it's-that-one; I've downloaded it for ereading purposes, but may or may not bounce off it because it isn't ybeb...)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 04:10 pm (UTC)Nod, nod. Entirely fair. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-10 09:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-10 09:11 pm (UTC)(ybeb is your blue-eyed boys, which I adore and will not shut up about and which is the entire reason I care about the MCU at all.)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 09:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-09 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-15 03:45 pm (UTC)WTF, MCU writers! You ask the big moral questions of the characters who have agency, not the ones who were powerless puppets.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-10 05:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-12 07:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-12 07:36 pm (UTC)ALSO what about shit Banner does when he hulks out
ALSO what about Howard Stark and his death machines
ALSO what about Tony Stark and his terrible decisions (tm) *coughultroncoughultron*
ALSO you're telling me everything Nick Fury does is legit and doesn't deserve punishment?
I call bullshit
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-12 10:22 pm (UTC)Given that the treatment-of-Bucky stuff in 2 was triggery for me, and if this is how the writers treat him.. Yeah, I have absolutely no interest now/active-distance from ever seeing this even casually.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-12 10:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-12 10:38 pm (UTC)I'm glad this was useful information. I have... kind of been doing the rounds of telling people to whom I think it's directly relevant "do NOT see this movie, do NOT NOT NOT, it is a TERRIBLE IDEA", becauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse yeah.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-16 04:58 am (UTC)Anyway, this is all I was intending to add to the conversation (a wonderful legacy courtesy of US congressional witch-hunts for vice and a comics industry that had little in the way of backbone and conviction): CCA.
Look familiar?
(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-17 12:00 pm (UTC)