I do wonder if there is something else we could call these besides "sick" systems. Abusive systems seems to be what I am getting from the term. khronos_keeper uses the word "vampiric".
The thing about "sick" is that is seems natural and accidental, rather than purposeful and unnatural.
I think I see what you mean. "Sick" seems to denote a level of victimhood on part of the afflicted system, when you (and my meta) is pointing toward concerted action of the system to milk a system member while preserving (or hoarding) as much resources as possible.
Unfortunately this is one of those questions that cannot be answered simply, and depends a lot on the system or subsystem in question. It also calls into question whether or not we can reliably create a universal model that marks system sickliness and victimhood or victimization, especially across cultures who have vastly different concepts of all of the above.
I mean, suffering and sacrifice by a discrete member in a system hasn't always been seen as negative. Whereas now in most modern cultures, consistently being drained by a system is seen as a bad thing, when in other times and other cultures being drained dry was a mark of a person with a good character.
I think it's a massively complicated question, and it would take a lot of discussion about what could really always be considered sick or vampiric.
Alex was very right in her link to throw in "perceived" copetencies, and I could add that to "perceived" sick systems, as not even every member in a system who sacrifices the same amount will have the same perspective of a system's vampirism, or of their own victimhood.
I think I see what you mean. "Sick" seems to denote a level of victimhood on part of the afflicted system, when you (and my meta) is pointing toward concerted action of the system to milk a system member while preserving (or hoarding) as much resources as possible.
Unfortunately this is one of those questions that cannot be answered simply, and depends a lot on the system or subsystem in question. It also calls into question whether or not we can reliably create a universal model that marks system sickliness and victimhood or victimization, especially across cultures who have vastly different concepts of all of the above.
I mean, suffering and sacrifice by a discrete member in a system hasn't always been seen as negative. Whereas now in most modern cultures, consistently being drained by a system is seen as a bad thing, when in other times and other cultures being drained dry was a mark of a person with a good character.
I think it's a massively complicated question, and it would take a lot of discussion about what could really always be considered sick or vampiric.
Alex was very right in his link to throw in "perceived" copetencies, and I could add that to "perceived" sick systems, as not even every member in a system who sacrifices the same amount will have the same perspective of a system's vampirism, or of their own victimhood.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-05-07 02:40 am (UTC)The thing about "sick" is that is seems natural and accidental, rather than purposeful and unnatural.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-05-07 07:56 pm (UTC)Unfortunately this is one of those questions that cannot be answered simply, and depends a lot on the system or subsystem in question. It also calls into question whether or not we can reliably create a universal model that marks system sickliness and victimhood or victimization, especially across cultures who have vastly different concepts of all of the above.
I mean, suffering and sacrifice by a discrete member in a system hasn't always been seen as negative. Whereas now in most modern cultures, consistently being drained by a system is seen as a bad thing, when in other times and other cultures being drained dry was a mark of a person with a good character.
I think it's a massively complicated question, and it would take a lot of discussion about what could really always be considered sick or vampiric.
Alex was very right in her link to throw in "perceived" copetencies, and I could add that to "perceived" sick systems, as not even every member in a system who sacrifices the same amount will have the same perspective of a system's vampirism, or of their own victimhood.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-05-07 07:59 pm (UTC)Recomment for context (as ninja edits happen bc I fail)
Date: 2015-05-07 08:21 pm (UTC)Unfortunately this is one of those questions that cannot be answered simply, and depends a lot on the system or subsystem in question. It also calls into question whether or not we can reliably create a universal model that marks system sickliness and victimhood or victimization, especially across cultures who have vastly different concepts of all of the above.
I mean, suffering and sacrifice by a discrete member in a system hasn't always been seen as negative. Whereas now in most modern cultures, consistently being drained by a system is seen as a bad thing, when in other times and other cultures being drained dry was a mark of a person with a good character.
I think it's a massively complicated question, and it would take a lot of discussion about what could really always be considered sick or vampiric.
Alex was very right in his link to throw in "perceived" copetencies, and I could add that to "perceived" sick systems, as not even every member in a system who sacrifices the same amount will have the same perspective of a system's vampirism, or of their own victimhood.