kaberett: Trans symbol with Swiss Army knife tools at other positions around the central circle. (Default)
kaberett ([personal profile] kaberett) wrote2014-09-16 12:04 am

Politics of pronouns in the Imperial Radch

(Not sure what's going on here? The answer is Ancillary Justice.)

We're told that Radchaai does not bother with gendered pronouns. It seems to me that the default pronoun used means gender-irrelevant (rather than gender-unknown or gender-specific, which seem to me to be a useful way of considering pronouns of gendered beings). We're told that Strigan's society uses gender-known pronouns even though it professes to consider gender irrelevant.

And yet: the Radchaai frequently refer to ships as "it" (I note that the standard English pronoun used to refer to vessels is the same as the way in which the Radchaai default pronoun is rendered). It's clearly not as simple as in/animate - ships have emotions, ships have personality and identity, ships are sentient, ships have ancillaries. Except that this is done in a literally dehumanising way - ships are explicitly not Radchaai, not citizens, and therefore not considered human; characters who are uninterested in or unsympathetic toward ships are far more likely to refer to them as "it", whereas characters who like ships seem to mostly not pronoun them; non-Radchaai humans are generally called the standard pronoun for Radchaai, despite being considered by at least some in the society to have sub-human status - and so I am left picking away at what distinction it is the Radch is making here...

Thoughts very much appreciated!
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-16 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
I remember it being fuzzy where AM came from. From the dyson sphere, but I'm not sure if it was full of humans or super-humans or AIs or post-human AIs or what. I assumed AM was originally a specific human and all their identical clones were of that original body, so people who gender them, use the gender of their bodies. But I'm not sure if there's any support in the book for that.

Good observation about the pronouns not applying to ships, I'd not thought about that at all. In a lot of sci-fi, there's an additional reason people may use "it" for AIs, if they're nongendered, but that doesn't apply in the Radch. I guess, they don't treat ships as people, but they do treat AM as a person.
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-16 10:44 am (UTC)(link)
One of the things I was a little bit unsatisfied by in AJ was that there were some things which I thought would be common knowledge, which were never quite brought up. Some of these I imagine will be in a sequel, but it still felt like I was missing something. Both "was an AI" and "was originally human" feel like most people would know SOMETHING about that, if only vague speculation, or common sense is-that-possible, but I don't remember anything.

Oh, God Eaters sounds fascinating, I want to read that.
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-16 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Squee! Thank you.
sfred: Fred wearing a hat in front of a trans flag (Default)

[personal profile] sfred 2014-09-16 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked that vagueness: the feel of the setup without the exposition. I do hope we learn more in future books, though.
davidgillon: A pair of crutches, hanging from coat hooks, reflected in a mirror (Default)

[personal profile] davidgillon 2014-09-16 01:07 pm (UTC)(link)
"AM is 'she' and 'my Lord' in Radchaai"

Which is playing games with gender perception right there!
davidgillon: A pair of crutches, hanging from coat hooks, reflected in a mirror (Default)

[personal profile] davidgillon 2014-09-18 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly meaningless observation:
AM 3000 years old
Breq 2000 years old
Seivarden 1000 years old
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-16 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm still pretty convinced that AM is an AI who seized core Radch space out of some sort of drive to protect some specific humans (a particularly favoured captain and her family?)

Oh, oh, oh. That does make so much sense...
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-16 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, yes. That makes more and more sense.

I always hope examining a book closely will make things clearer, but have also seen too many first-books-in-series where inconsistencies turn out to be "author didn't think of that" not "interesting clue to the underlying world". So I'm always too cynical at first, even when it turns out there IS a really convincing interpretation which I didn't see immediately.
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2014-09-17 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you, I really love trying to work things like this out with someone else.
vass: Small turtle with green leaf in its mouth (Default)

[personal profile] vass 2014-11-26 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
"I can't be a captain. I'm not a citizen. I'm not even human."
"You are if I say you are, she said.


Late reply because I've been rereading this whole post/comments and have thoughts. And because I ran across that quotation and it backed up what you were saying about exceptionalism and under what conditions ships get to be citizens.