I find it really hard to share my thoughts about competing access needs in asynchronous one-to-many communications because it's so hard for me to check in with my audience and make sure I've adequately set context & constrained, e.g., the kinds of events or job roles I'm talking about, ensured we all understand I'm talking about "and" rather than "instead of", and so on. In synchronous conversation, or not-too-asynchronous conversation, I can check in with my conversators, and listen to course corrections in case I've made a bad assumption, mutually choose to expand or constrain the axis or job or event we're talking about, and do trust-building way better.
I am grateful for people who will share their views about competing access needs in asynchronous, one-to-many communication media, so I can read/listen and learn. I appreciate all the views I've read here.
no subject
I find it really hard to share my thoughts about competing access needs in asynchronous one-to-many communications because it's so hard for me to check in with my audience and make sure I've adequately set context & constrained, e.g., the kinds of events or job roles I'm talking about, ensured we all understand I'm talking about "and" rather than "instead of", and so on. In synchronous conversation, or not-too-asynchronous conversation, I can check in with my conversators, and listen to course corrections in case I've made a bad assumption, mutually choose to expand or constrain the axis or job or event we're talking about, and do trust-building way better.
I am grateful for people who will share their views about competing access needs in asynchronous, one-to-many communication media, so I can read/listen and learn. I appreciate all the views I've read here.