Sorry, I'm missing chunks of logic there. I don't mean that this should reduce your problem, because it clearly doesn't.
But I'd jumped to 'how would this be achievable' and from that perspective *someone* needs to care about why the pushback happens. (It is probably not because of a well-articulated belief in one's right to harm others; rather an entrenched but dysfunctional belief that one is only causing real harm to oneself and is being punished for chosing to do so.) And I'm pretty sure that the reason USyd's managed to get a reasonably effective smoke-free campus policy including outdoor spaces is that this was only a small step beyond their existing enforcement. If your uni doesn't enforce 'keep away from doors' then 'no smoking on campus at all anywhere' is not going to be implementable.
Switzerland is pretty decent at providing people places to use drugs that minimise the impact on everybody the fuck else, I don't see why the UK can't adopt a similarly enlightened approach, etc etc.
Not when the drugs are cigarettes they aren't. Geneva at least has no leave-access-routes-free policies, no restrictions on stations & bus stops, nor any outside dining spaces that are smoke-free. My uni here is *just about* managing to keep people from smoking in buildings. Maybe.
no subject
But I'd jumped to 'how would this be achievable' and from that perspective *someone* needs to care about why the pushback happens. (It is probably not because of a well-articulated belief in one's right to harm others; rather an entrenched but dysfunctional belief that one is only causing real harm to oneself and is being punished for chosing to do so.) And I'm pretty sure that the reason USyd's managed to get a reasonably effective smoke-free campus policy including outdoor spaces is that this was only a small step beyond their existing enforcement. If your uni doesn't enforce 'keep away from doors' then 'no smoking on campus at all anywhere' is not going to be implementable.
Switzerland is pretty decent at providing people places to use drugs that minimise the impact on everybody the fuck else, I don't see why the UK can't adopt a similarly enlightened approach, etc etc.
Not when the drugs are cigarettes they aren't. Geneva at least has no leave-access-routes-free policies, no restrictions on stations & bus stops, nor any outside dining spaces that are smoke-free. My uni here is *just about* managing to keep people from smoking in buildings. Maybe.